Alfonso Condemi De Felice vs Damiano Lami
Weekend Accademia Autunno, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Colle System (D04).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alfonso Condemi De Felice vs Damiano Lami with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alfonso Condemi De Felice (1907)
- Black
- Damiano Lami (1652)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Weekend Accademia Autunno
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Colle System (D04)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alfonso Condemi De Felice (1907) and Damiano Lami (1652) was played at Weekend Accademia Autunno in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Colle System (D04). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alfonso Condemi De Felice games or Damiano Lami games? This Alfonso Condemi De Felice vs Damiano Lami encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Colle System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alfonso Condemi De Felice vs Damiano Lami?
Alfonso Condemi De Felice vs Damiano Lami (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Alfonso Condemi De Felice.
What opening was played in Alfonso Condemi De Felice vs Damiano Lami?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Colle System (ECO D04).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alfonso Condemi De Felice vs Damiano Lami, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.