Antonio Conde Poderoso vs Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin
EU/C2015/pr.09, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B95).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Conde Poderoso vs Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Conde Poderoso (2157)
- Black
- Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin (2241)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/C2015/pr.09
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B95)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Conde Poderoso (2157) and Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin (2241) was played at EU/C2015/pr.09 in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B95). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Conde Poderoso games or Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin games? This Antonio Conde Poderoso vs Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Conde Poderoso vs Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin?
Antonio Conde Poderoso vs Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Antonio Conde Poderoso vs Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (ECO B95).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Conde Poderoso vs Oleg Nikolaevich Petrigin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.