Camila Colombo vs Mateo Arcos Facio
URU Ch, 2011 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Camila Colombo vs Mateo Arcos Facio with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Camila Colombo (2094)
- Black
- Mateo Arcos Facio (2109)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- URU Ch
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Camila Colombo (2094) and Mateo Arcos Facio (2109) was played at URU Ch in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Camila Colombo games or Mateo Arcos Facio games? This Camila Colombo vs Mateo Arcos Facio encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Camila Colombo vs Mateo Arcos Facio?
Camila Colombo vs Mateo Arcos Facio (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Mateo Arcos Facio.
What opening was played in Camila Colombo vs Mateo Arcos Facio?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Camila Colombo vs Mateo Arcos Facio, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.