Marcus Coleman vs Jason Wawrzaszek
30. NAO Open, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (E09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcus Coleman vs Jason Wawrzaszek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcus Coleman (2200)
- Black
- Jason Wawrzaszek (1987)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 30. NAO Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (E09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcus Coleman (2200) and Jason Wawrzaszek (1987) was played at 30. NAO Open in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (E09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcus Coleman games or Jason Wawrzaszek games? This Marcus Coleman vs Jason Wawrzaszek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcus Coleman vs Jason Wawrzaszek?
Marcus Coleman vs Jason Wawrzaszek (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Marcus Coleman.
What opening was played in Marcus Coleman vs Jason Wawrzaszek?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation (ECO E09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcus Coleman vs Jason Wawrzaszek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.