David J Coleman vs Matthew Lunn
4NCL Division 2d, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David J Coleman vs Matthew Lunn with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David J Coleman (2149)
- Black
- Matthew Lunn (2081)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 4NCL Division 2d
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57)
About this chess game
This chess game between David J Coleman (2149) and Matthew Lunn (2081) was played at 4NCL Division 2d in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David J Coleman games or Matthew Lunn games? This David J Coleman vs Matthew Lunn encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David J Coleman vs Matthew Lunn?
David J Coleman vs Matthew Lunn (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David J Coleman vs Matthew Lunn?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (ECO B57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David J Coleman vs Matthew Lunn, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.