Margarida Coimbra vs Modeste Mendes
2013 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Margarida Coimbra vs Modeste Mendes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Margarida Coimbra (2093)
- Black
- Modeste Mendes (1770)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06)
About this chess game
This chess game between Margarida Coimbra (2093) and Modeste Mendes (1770) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (C06). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Margarida Coimbra games or Modeste Mendes games? This Margarida Coimbra vs Modeste Mendes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Margarida Coimbra vs Modeste Mendes?
Margarida Coimbra vs Modeste Mendes (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Margarida Coimbra.
What opening was played in Margarida Coimbra vs Modeste Mendes?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation, Main Line (ECO C06).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Margarida Coimbra vs Modeste Mendes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.