Velho Jose Luis Coelho vs Luiz Fabio Alves Jales
Brazil Open 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Catalan Opening: Closed (E01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Velho Jose Luis Coelho vs Luiz Fabio Alves Jales with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Velho Jose Luis Coelho (2390)
- Black
- Luiz Fabio Alves Jales (1829)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Brazil Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Closed (E01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Velho Jose Luis Coelho (2390) and Luiz Fabio Alves Jales (1829) was played at Brazil Open 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Closed (E01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Velho Jose Luis Coelho games or Luiz Fabio Alves Jales games? This Velho Jose Luis Coelho vs Luiz Fabio Alves Jales encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Velho Jose Luis Coelho vs Luiz Fabio Alves Jales?
Velho Jose Luis Coelho vs Luiz Fabio Alves Jales (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Velho Jose Luis Coelho.
What opening was played in Velho Jose Luis Coelho vs Luiz Fabio Alves Jales?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Closed (ECO E01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Velho Jose Luis Coelho vs Luiz Fabio Alves Jales, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.