Ramyres Santana Coelho vs Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo
2017 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Fianchetto Attack (A81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ramyres Santana Coelho vs Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ramyres Santana Coelho (1983)
- Black
- Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo (1768)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Fianchetto Attack (A81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ramyres Santana Coelho (1983) and Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo (1768) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Fianchetto Attack (A81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ramyres Santana Coelho games or Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo games? This Ramyres Santana Coelho vs Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Fianchetto Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ramyres Santana Coelho vs Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo?
Ramyres Santana Coelho vs Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ramyres Santana Coelho vs Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Fianchetto Attack (ECO A81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ramyres Santana Coelho vs Eduardo Jose E De Azevedo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.