Robert Clarkson vs Leighton Nicholls
2016 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Clarkson vs Leighton Nicholls with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Clarkson (1572)
- Black
- Leighton Nicholls (1934)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Clarkson (1572) and Leighton Nicholls (1934) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (A31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Clarkson games or Leighton Nicholls games? This Robert Clarkson vs Leighton Nicholls encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Clarkson vs Leighton Nicholls?
Robert Clarkson vs Leighton Nicholls (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Leighton Nicholls.
What opening was played in Robert Clarkson vs Leighton Nicholls?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Anti-Benoni Variation (ECO A31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Clarkson vs Leighton Nicholls, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.