James Clancey vs Nikolaj Sazonov
DE15A pr 7, 2021 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay James Clancey vs Nikolaj Sazonov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- James Clancey (1765)
- Black
- Nikolaj Sazonov (1939)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- DE15A pr 7
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21)
About this chess game
This chess game between James Clancey (1765) and Nikolaj Sazonov (1939) was played at DE15A pr 7 in 2021 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more James Clancey games or Nikolaj Sazonov games? This James Clancey vs Nikolaj Sazonov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won James Clancey vs Nikolaj Sazonov?
James Clancey vs Nikolaj Sazonov (2021) finished 0–1, a win for Nikolaj Sazonov.
What opening was played in James Clancey vs Nikolaj Sazonov?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (ECO A21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of James Clancey vs Nikolaj Sazonov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.