Jos Claeys vs Benet Pantebre Martinez
date unknown · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jos Claeys vs Benet Pantebre Martinez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jos Claeys
- Black
- Benet Pantebre Martinez (1899)
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jos Claeys and Benet Pantebre Martinez (1899) was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jos Claeys games or Benet Pantebre Martinez games? This Jos Claeys vs Benet Pantebre Martinez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jos Claeys vs Benet Pantebre Martinez?
Jos Claeys vs Benet Pantebre Martinez finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jos Claeys vs Benet Pantebre Martinez?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (ECO A36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jos Claeys vs Benet Pantebre Martinez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.