Selim Citak vs Melik Firat Ikis
ch-TUR 2012, 2012 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Selim Citak vs Melik Firat Ikis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Selim Citak (2357)
- Black
- Melik Firat Ikis (1929)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ch-TUR 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Selim Citak (2357) and Melik Firat Ikis (1929) was played at ch-TUR 2012 in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Selim Citak games or Melik Firat Ikis games? This Selim Citak vs Melik Firat Ikis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Selim Citak vs Melik Firat Ikis?
Selim Citak vs Melik Firat Ikis (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Selim Citak vs Melik Firat Ikis?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Selim Citak vs Melik Firat Ikis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.