Amick Cisneros Rodriguez vs Fernando Montes De Santiago
2014 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Amick Cisneros Rodriguez vs Fernando Montes De Santiago with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Amick Cisneros Rodriguez (1711)
- Black
- Fernando Montes De Santiago (1826)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Amick Cisneros Rodriguez (1711) and Fernando Montes De Santiago (1826) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Amick Cisneros Rodriguez games or Fernando Montes De Santiago games? This Amick Cisneros Rodriguez vs Fernando Montes De Santiago encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Amick Cisneros Rodriguez vs Fernando Montes De Santiago?
Amick Cisneros Rodriguez vs Fernando Montes De Santiago (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Amick Cisneros Rodriguez vs Fernando Montes De Santiago?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Amick Cisneros Rodriguez vs Fernando Montes De Santiago, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.