Ivars Cintins vs Paolo Salati
CT20/pr29, 2013 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivars Cintins vs Paolo Salati with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivars Cintins (2302)
- Black
- Paolo Salati (1846)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CT20/pr29
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivars Cintins (2302) and Paolo Salati (1846) was played at CT20/pr29 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivars Cintins games or Paolo Salati games? This Ivars Cintins vs Paolo Salati encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivars Cintins vs Paolo Salati?
Ivars Cintins vs Paolo Salati (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Ivars Cintins.
What opening was played in Ivars Cintins vs Paolo Salati?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (ECO A25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivars Cintins vs Paolo Salati, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.