Roberto Cifuentes Parada vs Wijngaarden Sander Van
Leiden Open, 1992 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (D03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Cifuentes Parada vs Wijngaarden Sander Van with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Cifuentes Parada (2540)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Leiden Open
- Year
- 1992
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (D03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Cifuentes Parada (2540) and Wijngaarden Sander Van was played at Leiden Open in 1992 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (D03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Cifuentes Parada games or Wijngaarden Sander Van games? This Roberto Cifuentes Parada vs Wijngaarden Sander Van encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Cifuentes Parada vs Wijngaarden Sander Van?
Roberto Cifuentes Parada vs Wijngaarden Sander Van (1992) finished 1–0, a win for Roberto Cifuentes Parada.
What opening was played in Roberto Cifuentes Parada vs Wijngaarden Sander Van?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack (ECO D03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Cifuentes Parada vs Wijngaarden Sander Van, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.