Augusto Walter Ciciotti vs Francisco Manuel Fe Castro
WS/MN/134, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Semi-Slav Defense (D43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Augusto Walter Ciciotti vs Francisco Manuel Fe Castro with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Augusto Walter Ciciotti (2396)
- Black
- Francisco Manuel Fe Castro (1747)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/MN/134
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense (D43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Augusto Walter Ciciotti (2396) and Francisco Manuel Fe Castro (1747) was played at WS/MN/134 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense (D43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Augusto Walter Ciciotti games or Francisco Manuel Fe Castro games? This Augusto Walter Ciciotti vs Francisco Manuel Fe Castro encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Augusto Walter Ciciotti vs Francisco Manuel Fe Castro?
Augusto Walter Ciciotti vs Francisco Manuel Fe Castro (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Augusto Walter Ciciotti.
What opening was played in Augusto Walter Ciciotti vs Francisco Manuel Fe Castro?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense (ECO D43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Augusto Walter Ciciotti vs Francisco Manuel Fe Castro, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.