Slavko Cicak vs Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez
La Pobla de Lillet ESP, Open 2006, date unknown · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense (E61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Slavko Cicak vs Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Slavko Cicak (2500)
- Black
- Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez (2245)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- La Pobla de Lillet ESP, Open 2006
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense (E61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Slavko Cicak (2500) and Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez (2245) was played at La Pobla de Lillet ESP, Open 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense (E61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Slavko Cicak games or Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez games? This Slavko Cicak vs Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Slavko Cicak vs Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez?
Slavko Cicak vs Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Slavko Cicak vs Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense (ECO E61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Slavko Cicak vs Francisco Javier Garcia Jimenez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.