Ralf Ciaxz vs Floyd Halwick
Corr, 2002 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ralf Ciaxz vs Floyd Halwick with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ralf Ciaxz
- Black
- Floyd Halwick (2283)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Corr
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ralf Ciaxz and Floyd Halwick (2283) was played at Corr in 2002 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (E66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ralf Ciaxz games or Floyd Halwick games? This Ralf Ciaxz vs Floyd Halwick encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ralf Ciaxz vs Floyd Halwick?
Ralf Ciaxz vs Floyd Halwick (2002) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ralf Ciaxz vs Floyd Halwick?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation, Advance Line (ECO E66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ralf Ciaxz vs Floyd Halwick, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.