Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal vs Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano
2016 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Classical Variation (C11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal vs Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal (2209)
- Black
- Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano (1909)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Classical Variation (C11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal (2209) and Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano (1909) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Classical Variation (C11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal games or Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano games? This Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal vs Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal vs Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano?
Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal vs Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal.
What opening was played in Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal vs Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano?
The game opened with the French Defense: Classical Variation (ECO C11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ann Chumpitaz Carbajal vs Mitzy Mishell Caballero Quijano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.