Aleksandr Chumakov vs Vladislav Zakirov
2015 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandr Chumakov vs Vladislav Zakirov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandr Chumakov (1500)
- Black
- Vladislav Zakirov (1910)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandr Chumakov (1500) and Vladislav Zakirov (1910) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandr Chumakov games or Vladislav Zakirov games? This Aleksandr Chumakov vs Vladislav Zakirov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandr Chumakov vs Vladislav Zakirov?
Aleksandr Chumakov vs Vladislav Zakirov (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Vladislav Zakirov.
What opening was played in Aleksandr Chumakov vs Vladislav Zakirov?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (ECO E83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandr Chumakov vs Vladislav Zakirov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.