Teo Kong Lester Cheung vs John E Richards
1999 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind (B36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Teo Kong Lester Cheung vs John E Richards with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Teo Kong Lester Cheung (2013)
- Black
- John E Richards (2048)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 1999
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind (B36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Teo Kong Lester Cheung (2013) and John E Richards (2048) was played in 1999 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind (B36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Teo Kong Lester Cheung games or John E Richards games? This Teo Kong Lester Cheung vs John E Richards encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Teo Kong Lester Cheung vs John E Richards?
Teo Kong Lester Cheung vs John E Richards (1999) finished 1–0, a win for Teo Kong Lester Cheung.
What opening was played in Teo Kong Lester Cheung vs John E Richards?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind (ECO B36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Teo Kong Lester Cheung vs John E Richards, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.