Timothy Chesters vs Jonathan F Parker
Oxford-Cambridge Match, London ENG, 1995 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Timothy Chesters vs Jonathan F Parker with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Timothy Chesters
- Black
- Jonathan F Parker (2400)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Oxford-Cambridge Match, London ENG
- Year
- 1995
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Timothy Chesters and Jonathan F Parker (2400) was played at Oxford-Cambridge Match, London ENG in 1995 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Timothy Chesters games or Jonathan F Parker games? This Timothy Chesters vs Jonathan F Parker encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Timothy Chesters vs Jonathan F Parker?
Timothy Chesters vs Jonathan F Parker (1995) finished 0–1, a win for Jonathan F Parker.
What opening was played in Timothy Chesters vs Jonathan F Parker?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Timothy Chesters vs Jonathan F Parker, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.