Olga Chernichenko vs Tatiana Efanova
2009 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (B77).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Olga Chernichenko vs Tatiana Efanova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Olga Chernichenko (1960)
- Black
- Tatiana Efanova (1888)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (B77)
About this chess game
This chess game between Olga Chernichenko (1960) and Tatiana Efanova (1888) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (B77). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Olga Chernichenko games or Tatiana Efanova games? This Olga Chernichenko vs Tatiana Efanova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Olga Chernichenko vs Tatiana Efanova?
Olga Chernichenko vs Tatiana Efanova (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Olga Chernichenko vs Tatiana Efanova?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Main Line (ECO B77).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Olga Chernichenko vs Tatiana Efanova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.