Abidala Juvino Chaves vs Celio Oliveira Barbosa
2013 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Abidala Juvino Chaves vs Celio Oliveira Barbosa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Abidala Juvino Chaves (1800)
- Black
- Celio Oliveira Barbosa (2048)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Abidala Juvino Chaves (1800) and Celio Oliveira Barbosa (2048) was played in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Abidala Juvino Chaves games or Celio Oliveira Barbosa games? This Abidala Juvino Chaves vs Celio Oliveira Barbosa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Abidala Juvino Chaves vs Celio Oliveira Barbosa?
Abidala Juvino Chaves vs Celio Oliveira Barbosa (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Celio Oliveira Barbosa.
What opening was played in Abidala Juvino Chaves vs Celio Oliveira Barbosa?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Abidala Juvino Chaves vs Celio Oliveira Barbosa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.