Gaspard Chaumont vs Sandor Bartha
Parijs, 1991 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gaspard Chaumont vs Sandor Bartha with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gaspard Chaumont (2186)
- Black
- Sandor Bartha (2305)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Parijs
- Year
- 1991
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gaspard Chaumont (2186) and Sandor Bartha (2305) was played at Parijs in 1991 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gaspard Chaumont games or Sandor Bartha games? This Gaspard Chaumont vs Sandor Bartha encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gaspard Chaumont vs Sandor Bartha?
Gaspard Chaumont vs Sandor Bartha (1991) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Gaspard Chaumont vs Sandor Bartha?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gaspard Chaumont vs Sandor Bartha, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.