Manuel A Chapuseaux vs John R Litvin
Corr, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (E33).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manuel A Chapuseaux vs John R Litvin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manuel A Chapuseaux (1900)
- Black
- John R Litvin (1625)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (E33)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manuel A Chapuseaux (1900) and John R Litvin (1625) was played at Corr and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (E33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manuel A Chapuseaux games or John R Litvin games? This Manuel A Chapuseaux vs John R Litvin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manuel A Chapuseaux vs John R Litvin?
Manuel A Chapuseaux vs John R Litvin finished 1–0, a win for Manuel A Chapuseaux.
What opening was played in Manuel A Chapuseaux vs John R Litvin?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Zurich Variation (ECO E33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manuel A Chapuseaux vs John R Litvin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.