Divyasree Chandika vs Srinath Narayanan
Delhi IND, Commonwealth Ch, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Divyasree Chandika vs Srinath Narayanan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Divyasree Chandika (2114)
- Black
- Srinath Narayanan (2393)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Delhi IND, Commonwealth Ch
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Divyasree Chandika (2114) and Srinath Narayanan (2393) was played at Delhi IND, Commonwealth Ch in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Divyasree Chandika games or Srinath Narayanan games? This Divyasree Chandika vs Srinath Narayanan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Divyasree Chandika vs Srinath Narayanan?
Divyasree Chandika vs Srinath Narayanan (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Srinath Narayanan.
What opening was played in Divyasree Chandika vs Srinath Narayanan?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (ECO C48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Divyasree Chandika vs Srinath Narayanan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.