Luc Chamberland vs David Lawless
Scarborough CC Spring-Summer Swiss, 2022 · Result 0–1 · King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (C31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luc Chamberland vs David Lawless with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luc Chamberland (1464)
- Black
- David Lawless (1991)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Scarborough CC Spring-Summer Swiss
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (C31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luc Chamberland (1464) and David Lawless (1991) was played at Scarborough CC Spring-Summer Swiss in 2022 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (C31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luc Chamberland games or David Lawless games? This Luc Chamberland vs David Lawless encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luc Chamberland vs David Lawless?
Luc Chamberland vs David Lawless (2022) finished 0–1, a win for David Lawless.
What opening was played in Luc Chamberland vs David Lawless?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Declined: Falkbeer Countergambit (ECO C31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luc Chamberland vs David Lawless, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.