Leonardo Giovan Cevasco Balcazar vs Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez
2011 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game (C50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonardo Giovan Cevasco Balcazar vs Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez (1521)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Italian Game (C50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonardo Giovan Cevasco Balcazar and Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez (1521) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game (C50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonardo Giovan Cevasco Balcazar games or Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez games? This Leonardo Giovan Cevasco Balcazar vs Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonardo Giovan Cevasco Balcazar vs Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez?
Leonardo Giovan Cevasco Balcazar vs Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez.
What opening was played in Leonardo Giovan Cevasco Balcazar vs Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez?
The game opened with the Italian Game (ECO C50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonardo Giovan Cevasco Balcazar vs Jorge Emiliano De Dios Suarez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.