Kardelen Cemhan vs Gizem Sahin
Turkish Bank Chess League 2012, 2012 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kardelen Cemhan vs Gizem Sahin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kardelen Cemhan (2037)
- Black
- Gizem Sahin (1557)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Turkish Bank Chess League 2012
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kardelen Cemhan (2037) and Gizem Sahin (1557) was played at Turkish Bank Chess League 2012 in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (C05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kardelen Cemhan games or Gizem Sahin games? This Kardelen Cemhan vs Gizem Sahin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kardelen Cemhan vs Gizem Sahin?
Kardelen Cemhan vs Gizem Sahin (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Kardelen Cemhan.
What opening was played in Kardelen Cemhan vs Gizem Sahin?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation (ECO C05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kardelen Cemhan vs Gizem Sahin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.