Jorge Cedres vs Ruben Delbono
It Open, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorge Cedres vs Ruben Delbono with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorge Cedres
- Black
- Ruben Delbono (1666)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- It Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorge Cedres and Ruben Delbono (1666) was played at It Open in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorge Cedres games or Ruben Delbono games? This Jorge Cedres vs Ruben Delbono encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorge Cedres vs Ruben Delbono?
Jorge Cedres vs Ruben Delbono (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Ruben Delbono.
What opening was played in Jorge Cedres vs Ruben Delbono?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (ECO B73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorge Cedres vs Ruben Delbono, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.