Daniel Cawdery vs Nicholas Van der Nat
2013 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Cawdery vs Nicholas Van der Nat with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Cawdery (2324)
- Black
- Nicholas Van der Nat (2337)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Cawdery (2324) and Nicholas Van der Nat (2337) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Cawdery games or Nicholas Van der Nat games? This Daniel Cawdery vs Nicholas Van der Nat encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Cawdery vs Nicholas Van der Nat?
Daniel Cawdery vs Nicholas Van der Nat (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Daniel Cawdery vs Nicholas Van der Nat?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (ECO B35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Cawdery vs Nicholas Van der Nat, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.