Daniel Cawdery vs George Michelakis
RSA Ch, 2003 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Cawdery vs George Michelakis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Cawdery (2182)
- Black
- George Michelakis (2405)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- RSA Ch
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Cawdery (2182) and George Michelakis (2405) was played at RSA Ch in 2003 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Cawdery games or George Michelakis games? This Daniel Cawdery vs George Michelakis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Cawdery vs George Michelakis?
Daniel Cawdery vs George Michelakis (2003) finished 0–1, a win for George Michelakis.
What opening was played in Daniel Cawdery vs George Michelakis?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Cawdery vs George Michelakis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.