Evan Cavailles vs Frederic Lemaire
2. Espalion Open 2017, 2017 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C75).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Evan Cavailles vs Frederic Lemaire with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Evan Cavailles (1806)
- Black
- Frederic Lemaire (1486)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 2. Espalion Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C75)
About this chess game
This chess game between Evan Cavailles (1806) and Frederic Lemaire (1486) was played at 2. Espalion Open 2017 in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (C75). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Evan Cavailles games or Frederic Lemaire games? This Evan Cavailles vs Frederic Lemaire encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Evan Cavailles vs Frederic Lemaire?
Evan Cavailles vs Frederic Lemaire (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Evan Cavailles vs Frederic Lemaire?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense (ECO C75).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Evan Cavailles vs Frederic Lemaire, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.