Jose Cavadas vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller
2010 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Cavadas vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Cavadas (1730)
- Black
- Luis Rodriguez Bachiller (1894)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Cavadas (1730) and Luis Rodriguez Bachiller (1894) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Cavadas games or Luis Rodriguez Bachiller games? This Jose Cavadas vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Cavadas vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller?
Jose Cavadas vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Jose Cavadas.
What opening was played in Jose Cavadas vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Cavadas vs Luis Rodriguez Bachiller, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.