Jaime Caurapan Osses vs Alfonso San Martin Zambrano
2009 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaime Caurapan Osses vs Alfonso San Martin Zambrano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaime Caurapan Osses (2167)
- Black
- Alfonso San Martin Zambrano (1833)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaime Caurapan Osses (2167) and Alfonso San Martin Zambrano (1833) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (C67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaime Caurapan Osses games or Alfonso San Martin Zambrano games? This Jaime Caurapan Osses vs Alfonso San Martin Zambrano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaime Caurapan Osses vs Alfonso San Martin Zambrano?
Jaime Caurapan Osses vs Alfonso San Martin Zambrano (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Alfonso San Martin Zambrano.
What opening was played in Jaime Caurapan Osses vs Alfonso San Martin Zambrano?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Rio Gambit Accepted (ECO C67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaime Caurapan Osses vs Alfonso San Martin Zambrano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.