Ivette Catala Matienzo vs Carlos Rivero Gonzalez
2010 · Result 1–0 · Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (A49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivette Catala Matienzo vs Carlos Rivero Gonzalez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivette Catala Matienzo (2159)
- Black
- Carlos Rivero Gonzalez (2044)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (A49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivette Catala Matienzo (2159) and Carlos Rivero Gonzalez (2044) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (A49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivette Catala Matienzo games or Carlos Rivero Gonzalez games? This Ivette Catala Matienzo vs Carlos Rivero Gonzalez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivette Catala Matienzo vs Carlos Rivero Gonzalez?
Ivette Catala Matienzo vs Carlos Rivero Gonzalez (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Ivette Catala Matienzo.
What opening was played in Ivette Catala Matienzo vs Carlos Rivero Gonzalez?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation (ECO A49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivette Catala Matienzo vs Carlos Rivero Gonzalez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.