Marcos Castro vs Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves
Corr, 1994 · Result 0–1 · Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense (C63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marcos Castro vs Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marcos Castro
- Black
- Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves (1647)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr
- Year
- 1994
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense (C63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marcos Castro and Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves (1647) was played at Corr in 1994 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense (C63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marcos Castro games or Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves games? This Marcos Castro vs Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marcos Castro vs Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves?
Marcos Castro vs Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves (1994) finished 0–1, a win for Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves.
What opening was played in Marcos Castro vs Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Schliemann Defense (ECO C63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marcos Castro vs Luiz Osvaldo Cifuentes Goncalves, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.