Josimar Barroso Castro vs Julio Eimard De Freitas
2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Josimar Barroso Castro vs Julio Eimard De Freitas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Josimar Barroso Castro (2080)
- Black
- Julio Eimard De Freitas (1873)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Josimar Barroso Castro (2080) and Julio Eimard De Freitas (1873) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Josimar Barroso Castro games or Julio Eimard De Freitas games? This Josimar Barroso Castro vs Julio Eimard De Freitas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Josimar Barroso Castro vs Julio Eimard De Freitas?
Josimar Barroso Castro vs Julio Eimard De Freitas (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Josimar Barroso Castro.
What opening was played in Josimar Barroso Castro vs Julio Eimard De Freitas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Josimar Barroso Castro vs Julio Eimard De Freitas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.