Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero vs Mark Frederick Noble
Pacific/TT7, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Petrov's Defense (C42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero vs Mark Frederick Noble with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero (2396)
- Black
- Mark Frederick Noble (2229)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Pacific/TT7
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense (C42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero (2396) and Mark Frederick Noble (2229) was played at Pacific/TT7 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Petrov's Defense (C42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero games or Mark Frederick Noble games? This Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero vs Mark Frederick Noble encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero vs Mark Frederick Noble?
Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero vs Mark Frederick Noble (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero vs Mark Frederick Noble?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense (ECO C42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Gerardo Castro Salguero vs Mark Frederick Noble, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.