Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez vs Tarvo Seeman
2003 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez vs Tarvo Seeman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez (1524)
- Black
- Tarvo Seeman (2446)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2003
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez (1524) and Tarvo Seeman (2446) was played in 2003 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez games or Tarvo Seeman games? This Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez vs Tarvo Seeman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez vs Tarvo Seeman?
Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez vs Tarvo Seeman (2003) finished 0–1, a win for Tarvo Seeman.
What opening was played in Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez vs Tarvo Seeman?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Carlos Eduardo Castro Gutierrez vs Tarvo Seeman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.