Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena vs Lewis Omar Perez Polanco
2017 · Result ½–½ · Petrov's Defense (C42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena vs Lewis Omar Perez Polanco with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena (1799)
- Black
- Lewis Omar Perez Polanco (2020)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense (C42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena (1799) and Lewis Omar Perez Polanco (2020) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Petrov's Defense (C42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena games or Lewis Omar Perez Polanco games? This Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena vs Lewis Omar Perez Polanco encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena vs Lewis Omar Perez Polanco?
Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena vs Lewis Omar Perez Polanco (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena vs Lewis Omar Perez Polanco?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense (ECO C42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patricia Evarista Castillo Pena vs Lewis Omar Perez Polanco, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.