Miguel Castilho vs Alberto J P Lixa
POR/CNA/pr14 3 (POR), 2020 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Castilho vs Alberto J P Lixa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Castilho (2226)
- Black
- Alberto J P Lixa (1804)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- POR/CNA/pr14 3 (POR)
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Castilho (2226) and Alberto J P Lixa (1804) was played at POR/CNA/pr14 3 (POR) in 2020 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Castilho games or Alberto J P Lixa games? This Miguel Castilho vs Alberto J P Lixa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Castilho vs Alberto J P Lixa?
Miguel Castilho vs Alberto J P Lixa (2020) finished 1–0, a win for Miguel Castilho.
What opening was played in Miguel Castilho vs Alberto J P Lixa?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Castilho vs Alberto J P Lixa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.