Cora Castellet Menchon vs David Guix Torres
2015 · Result 0–1 · Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Cora Castellet Menchon vs David Guix Torres with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Cora Castellet Menchon (1725)
- Black
- David Guix Torres (2084)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Cora Castellet Menchon (1725) and David Guix Torres (2084) was played in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (A58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Cora Castellet Menchon games or David Guix Torres games? This Cora Castellet Menchon vs David Guix Torres encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Cora Castellet Menchon vs David Guix Torres?
Cora Castellet Menchon vs David Guix Torres (2015) finished 0–1, a win for David Guix Torres.
What opening was played in Cora Castellet Menchon vs David Guix Torres?
The game opened with the Benko Gambit Accepted: Fully Accepted Variation (ECO A58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Cora Castellet Menchon vs David Guix Torres, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.