Enrique Castano Garzon vs Miguel Angel Crespo Arce
2001 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line (B89).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Enrique Castano Garzon vs Miguel Angel Crespo Arce with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Miguel Angel Crespo Arce (1863)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2001
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line (B89)
About this chess game
This chess game between Enrique Castano Garzon and Miguel Angel Crespo Arce (1863) was played in 2001 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line (B89). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Enrique Castano Garzon games or Miguel Angel Crespo Arce games? This Enrique Castano Garzon vs Miguel Angel Crespo Arce encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Enrique Castano Garzon vs Miguel Angel Crespo Arce?
Enrique Castano Garzon vs Miguel Angel Crespo Arce (2001) finished 0–1, a win for Miguel Angel Crespo Arce.
What opening was played in Enrique Castano Garzon vs Miguel Angel Crespo Arce?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack, Main Line (ECO B89).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Enrique Castano Garzon vs Miguel Angel Crespo Arce, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.