Gabriel Luanda Casimiro vs Cedric Lutz
Bad Homburg, 1997 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gabriel Luanda Casimiro vs Cedric Lutz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gabriel Luanda Casimiro (2575)
- Black
- Cedric Lutz (2590)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Bad Homburg
- Year
- 1997
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gabriel Luanda Casimiro (2575) and Cedric Lutz (2590) was played at Bad Homburg in 1997 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gabriel Luanda Casimiro games or Cedric Lutz games? This Gabriel Luanda Casimiro vs Cedric Lutz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gabriel Luanda Casimiro vs Cedric Lutz?
Gabriel Luanda Casimiro vs Cedric Lutz (1997) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Gabriel Luanda Casimiro vs Cedric Lutz?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gabriel Luanda Casimiro vs Cedric Lutz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.