Fernando Casanova vs Pedro Neves
Amadora POR, Men Ch 2010, 2010 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fernando Casanova vs Pedro Neves with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fernando Casanova (2090)
- Black
- Pedro Neves (2134)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Amadora POR, Men Ch 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fernando Casanova (2090) and Pedro Neves (2134) was played at Amadora POR, Men Ch 2010 in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fernando Casanova games or Pedro Neves games? This Fernando Casanova vs Pedro Neves encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fernando Casanova vs Pedro Neves?
Fernando Casanova vs Pedro Neves (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Fernando Casanova vs Pedro Neves?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (ECO A36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fernando Casanova vs Pedro Neves, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.