Marco Casadei vs Mario Vaccani
XXXIX C.to Italiano ASCI, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marco Casadei vs Mario Vaccani with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marco Casadei (1801)
- Black
- Mario Vaccani (1696)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- XXXIX C.to Italiano ASCI
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marco Casadei (1801) and Mario Vaccani (1696) was played at XXXIX C.to Italiano ASCI in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marco Casadei games or Mario Vaccani games? This Marco Casadei vs Mario Vaccani encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marco Casadei vs Mario Vaccani?
Marco Casadei vs Mario Vaccani (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Marco Casadei.
What opening was played in Marco Casadei vs Mario Vaccani?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marco Casadei vs Mario Vaccani, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.