Joao Alexandre Carvalho vs Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez
2016 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joao Alexandre Carvalho vs Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joao Alexandre Carvalho (1737)
- Black
- Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez (1963)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joao Alexandre Carvalho (1737) and Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez (1963) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joao Alexandre Carvalho games or Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez games? This Joao Alexandre Carvalho vs Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joao Alexandre Carvalho vs Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez?
Joao Alexandre Carvalho vs Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez.
What opening was played in Joao Alexandre Carvalho vs Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez?
The game opened with the French Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO C01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joao Alexandre Carvalho vs Jose Pablo Lopez Gomez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.