Jacob Carstensen vs Alexandre Danin
11. Teplice Open 2016, 2016 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacob Carstensen vs Alexandre Danin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacob Carstensen (2371)
- Black
- Alexandre Danin (2584)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 11. Teplice Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacob Carstensen (2371) and Alexandre Danin (2584) was played at 11. Teplice Open 2016 in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacob Carstensen games or Alexandre Danin games? This Jacob Carstensen vs Alexandre Danin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacob Carstensen vs Alexandre Danin?
Jacob Carstensen vs Alexandre Danin (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jacob Carstensen vs Alexandre Danin?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacob Carstensen vs Alexandre Danin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.